© Copyright Acquisition International 2024 - All Rights Reserved.

Article Image - Copyright Litigation- UK Trends
Posted 20th November 2015

Copyright Litigation- UK Trends

Ashfords is recognised nationally as a leading provider of legal and related professional services. Tom Phipps talks us through trends in the copyright litigation sector.

Mouse Scroll AnimationScroll to keep reading

Let us help promote your business to a wider following.

Copyright Litigation- UK Trends

Ashfords is recognised nationally as a leading provider of legal and related professional services. Tom Phipps talks us through trends in the copyright litigation sector.

Of all intellectual property rights, copyright is arguably the most all-pervasive. In the digital age copyright has reasserted that position; web content, software and digital content delivery such as streaming all depend on copyright for licensing and enforcement purposes. However, copyright litigation has always been regarded as high risk; copyright is not a registered right like trade marks or patents and ownership can be notoriously difficult to track and establish (anyone who has ever been involved in trying to identify who owns the rights to seminal rock album covers will testify to this!). In turn, copyright is technical and difficult; try, for example, applying the transitional provisions relating to photographs governing the various changes introduced by the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA) to the Copyright Act 1956 regime.

Such is the importance and influence of copyright in a world in which methods of delivering content has exploded in a way few could have imagined even 20 years ago that the need to litigate can be compelling and unavoidable. In the UK, the emergence of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) has helped to provide a forum for disputes to be dealt with relatively speedily and, at least by comparison with the High Court, cheaply.

IPEC, of course, used to be the Patents County Court (PCC). Established in 1990, the PCC was conceived as a means of providing access to the Courts in cases which otherwise might be priced out. Originally a patent Court, its jurisdiction was extended to the full range of intellectual property rights, and copyright cases can now be heard by a specialist intellectual property Judge sitting in IPEC. Now technically part of the High Court, it has its own procedural and other rules.

What are the key features of copyright litigation in IPEC? Like the County Court, IPEC can allocate cases to a Fast- or Multi-Track. In Fast-Track cases, the maximum damages award is £10000 and legal costs recovery is very limited, but the option is there for the straightforward case with a limited number of issues to determine. The Multi-Track (where the damages/financial remedy limit is £500000) is, for many rights-holders, a means of seeking justice in a tightly-controlled process but which still offers scope for a full trial and more generous legal costs recovery (up to £50000 plus £25000 on an account of profits procedure).   Generally, trials should not last more than 2 days.

In terms of remedies, although damages and costs recovery are limited as above, equitable remedies (such as injunctions, including, in Multi-Track cases, interim Search and Freezing Orders) are all available from IPEC.

The recoverable costs limitation does in itself help to impose some discipline on how the proceedings are conducted; in practice minds tend to be focused on the key issues rather than peripheral points.

To give a flavour of the kind of cases IPEC has been hearing recently, the following demonstrate their wide range and reflect the suitability of IPEC for resolving copyright disputes.  Absolute Lofts South West London Ltd v Artisan Home Improvements Ltd and Another  [2015] was a dispute about copyright in images of loft conversions. Both parties were involved in such conversions, and Artisan had reproduced Absolute’s photographs on its website. Absolute was awarded £300 compensatory damages and a further £6000 under art.13(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC (the Enforcement Directive). In Atelier Eighty Two v Kilnworx Climbing Centre CIC and Others [2015], IPEC reasserted the principle established in Robin Ray v Classic FM plc [1998] that, as Kilnworx had commissioned an agency to design logos for their use, it had an equitable entitlement to them. Minder Music Limited and Another v Sharples  [2015] concerned the song Touch Sensitive recorded by The Fall and released in 1999. The Claimants asserted that the copyright in the song was owned by Mark Smith (the lead singer) and Julia Adamson (former band member). Sharples, the producer of the song, claimed that he had also contributed as a writer. On the evidence, the Court found that Sharples had made a significant and original contribution to the music of the song entitling him to a 20% share of the copyright.

Obviously, the High Court remains the forum of choice for the right case. If an issue merits it and budgets allow, there can be no substitute for the unlimited trial time available for a case to be examined forensically by a Chancery Judge. The Judgment of Blackburne J at first instance in the Whiter Shade of Pale case (Fisher v Brooker & Anor [2006]) is instructive; the enthusiasm of the Judge for the subject-matter is evident from his examination and decompilation of the song and identification of the importance of its baroque organ solo in awarding its composer a 40% share of the copyright in the entire work. Such an analysis resulted from a lengthy trial with a substantial number of witnesses and few limits on the evidence and argument offered for judicial scrutiny; that would not have been procedurally achievable in IPEC. More recently, in IT Human Resources Plc v Land [2014] the Defendant, a director of the claimant company, provided software to another company while still with the Claimant. The Claimant sued, claiming copyright infringement and breach of fiduciary duty. The Chancery Division found for the Claimant and ordered an inquiry or account of profits.

Copyright litigation is alive and well in the UK. The availability of a choice of forum depending on the complexity and breadth of the issues makes civil justice more accessible and the enforcement of rights arguably more available for the less well-resourced rights-holder than otherwise might be the case.


Categories: Leadership

You Might Also Like
Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Employment Law at its Finest
18/06/2019Employment Law at its Finest

Flichy Grangé Avocats is a law firm specialising in employment law and social law for companies. Recently, it was awarded Most Outstanding Employment Law Firm 2018 – France for its work.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
How the Business Community Uses Bitcoin Despite Its Volatility
01/12/2020How the Business Community Uses Bitcoin Despite Its Volatility

The eventual goal of Bitcoin is to supplant fiat currency but volatility still remains the biggest barrier.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
An Innovation in Artificial Intelligence
01/02/2021An Innovation in Artificial Intelligence

AI has already begun to revolutionize every aspect of our lives, with the potential offered by this new technology still relatively untapped. A company that is heavily invested in the development of AI and its uses throughout different industries is AI.io. Rec

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Cryptography in 2016
30/06/2016Cryptography in 2016

Kingston Technology was founded in 1987 and has grown to be the world’s largest independent manufacturer of memory products.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Venture Capital Dollars Invested in Life Sciences Companies in 2014 at Highest Level Since 2007
12/03/2015Venture Capital Dollars Invested in Life Sciences Companies in 2014 at Highest Level Since 2007

Venture capitalists invested US$2.8bn in life sciences in the fourth quarter, reaching US$8.6bn in 2014, according to MoneyTree Report from PwC.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Forex Trading for Passive Income: Is It Possible?
29/09/2023Forex Trading for Passive Income: Is It Possible?

In a world driven by financial dreams and the quest for economic independence, creating passive income has emerged as a guiding light for many. People tirelessly search for avenues to accumulate wealth that don’t hinge solely on their daily toil. Introdu

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Jet Environmental and Jet AHU Acquired by Wozair Ltd
14/07/2016Jet Environmental and Jet AHU Acquired by Wozair Ltd

Jet Environmental Systems Ltd, the provider of temperature control solutions for industrial and commercial buildings, and its sister company Jet AHU Ltd, which supplies and installs air handling units, have been acquired by Wozair Ltd.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Aligning Your Startup Business Strategy with Success
27/01/2021Aligning Your Startup Business Strategy with Success

Are you ready to take the plunge into starting your own company? This decision is only the beginning. There are still several steps between making the decision and launching, and skipping any of them can reduce the likelihood of your success. By organizing you

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Ones to Watch in IP 2016 – Katz Group LLC
09/06/2016Ones to Watch in IP 2016 – Katz Group LLC

Katz Group regularly assists a variety of corporations, including advertising agencies, toy companies, pharmaceuticals, banks and food companies, with their global intellectual property and enforcement needs.

Our Trusted Brands

Acquisition International is a flagship brand of AI Global Media. AI Global Media is a B2B enterprise and are committed to creating engaging content allowing businesses to market their services to a larger global audience. We have 14 unique brands, each of which serves a specific industry or region. Each brand covers the latest news in its sector and publishes a digital magazine and newsletter which is read by a global audience.