© Copyright Acquisition International 2026 - All Rights Reserved.

Article Image - BREXIT Could be Expensive – Especially for the United Kingdom
Posted 27th April 2015

BREXIT Could be Expensive – Especially for the United Kingdom

Exiting the EU could cost the United Kingdom more than €300 billion.

Mouse Scroll AnimationScroll to keep reading

Let us help promote your business to a wider following.

BREXIT Could be Expensive – Especially for the United Kingdom
Image

BREXIT Could be Expensive – Especially for the United Kingdom

Exiting the EU could cost the United Kingdom more than €300 billion. The remaining EU member states would only experience minor economic losses from an exit. But elections in the British House of Commons could set a course for a bitter economic and above all political setback for the entire EU.

If the United Kingdom exits the EU in 2018 after the House of Commons elections on May 7, 2015 and a subsequent referendum on leaving the Union, this would have long-term negative consequences for the country’s growth dynamic and economic vitality. By contrast, the economic losses for Germany and the remaining EU member states would be significantly smaller. But the bottom line is that everyone involved would lose economically and politically from the UK leaving the EU (BREXIT). This is the conclusion reached by a current Bertelsmann Stiftung study in collaboration with the ifo Institute in Munich. It is the first study that examines the consequences of a UK exit from the EU (BREXIT) not only for the United Kingdom, but for all the other EU countries as well.

Calculating the economic effects of an EU exit is associated with many uncertainties and must take into account potential transitional periods. Three scenarios were developed to estimate the range of possible effects. In the most favorable case, the UK receives a status similar to Switzerland and still has a trade agreement with the EU. In the least favorable scenario, the country would lose all trade privileges arising from EU membership and its free trade agreements. In the year 2030 – 12 years after a possible BREXIT – we can assume that the negative effects will have shown their full impact.

Depending on the extent of the UK’s trade policy isolation, its real gross domestic product (GDP) per capita would be between 0.6% and 3% lower in the year 2030 than if the country remained in the EU. If the percentual losses are based on values from 2014, this would mean a real GDP per capita that is €220 lower in the most favorable scenario for the UK. With more severe isolation, the lost GDP could come in at €1025 per capita. If trade economic as well as dynamic economic consequences – such as the weakening of both innovative power as well as London as a financial center – are taken into account together, the GDP losses in the unfavorable scenario could reach 14 percent. If these losses are then based on values from the year 2014, this would correspond to a GDP that is around €313 billion lower for the entire national economy, or lower by around €4850 per capita. Possible savings such as the cancelling of EU budget payments that currently total around 0.5 percent of the British GDP could not compensate for economic losses, even in the best case scenario.

Above all, exiting the EU would increase the costs of trade between the UK and EU and reduce trade activities. The severity of the impact will differ for individual British industries. For the important area of financial services, anticipated losses in added value reach around 5 percent in the unfavorable scenario. The chemicals, mechanical engineering and automotive industries will see steep losses in added value because they are heavily incorporated in European value chains. The chemicals industry will face the greatest drop – nearly 11 percent.

By contrast, the economic deadweight welfare losses from a BREXIT would be significantly smaller for Germany and the remaining EU states. Depending on the extent of the UK’s trade policy isolation, Germany’s real gross domestic product (GDP) per capita when considering trade effects alone would only be between 0.1% and 0.3% lower in the year 2030 than if the country remained in the EU. Based on the GDP from 2014, this corresponds to a lower GDP per capita of €30-€115. Individual industries would be impacted differently by lower export levels to the UK. The automotive industry would see the greatest drop with a decline of up to 2%. In addition to the automotive industry, the electronics, metal production and food industries would all see negative cuts as well. Taking the dynamic consequences into account, Germany’s estimated GDP losses would come in between 0.3% and 2%. In terms of the national economy from 2014, this would be around €100 per capita (or €8.7 billion for the entire economy) for a low level of UK isolation and about €700 per capita (or almost €58 billion for the entire economy) for a loss of all UK trade privileges.

Categories: Finance


You Might Also Like
Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
4 Experts You Need on Board to Successfully Get Your Startup Off the Ground
Finance
03/03/20204 Experts You Need on Board to Successfully Get Your Startup Off the Ground

Getting your small business off the ground is a trying time. You have already invested a lot of time and energy into making your dream of being an entrepreneur a reality, and sticking to a projected timeline is critical if you want to succeed in opening your b

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Most Innovative Law Firm of 2016, Portugal
Legal
04/04/2016Most Innovative Law Firm of 2016, Portugal

The Most Innovative Law Firm of 2016, Portugal goes to Esquivel Advogados in Portugal.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Glu Mobile Acquires Controlling Interest in Crowdstar
M&A
04/11/2016Glu Mobile Acquires Controlling Interest in Crowdstar

Glu Mobile Inc, a leading global developer and publisher of free-to-play games for smartphone and tablet devices, announced today that it has acquired a controlling interest in Crowdstar, a global leader in mobile and social gaming, developing entertainment fo

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Constructing the Future in China
Legal
14/12/2015Constructing the Future in China

Zhong Lun Law Firm is a top-tier Chinese law firm based in Beijing with multiple offices at China’s major cities as well as in New York, London and Tokyo.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Bad First Impressions Drive One-Third of Consumers to Delete Apps
Strategy
03/12/2020Bad First Impressions Drive One-Third of Consumers to Delete Apps

ForgeRock®, the leading provider in digital identity, today announced the release of volume two of its global report, “The New Normal – Living Life Online.” The study polled 5,000 consumers throughout the U.S., U.K., Germany, Australia and Singapore to

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Small Businesses Are Less Optimistic but May Still Need Additional Credit
Finance
20/08/2015Small Businesses Are Less Optimistic but May Still Need Additional Credit

During the third quarter of 2015, small businesses and middle market companies appear to be less optimistic as the year comes to a close and many are in the midst of budget planning.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
What to Do After a Workplace Injury
Legal
22/04/2022What to Do After a Workplace Injury

Following an injury at your workplace, you have the right to workers' compensation benefits to cater for your medical bill, lost wages, and possible disability. Nevertheless, it's challenging to know what to do when you're ill or injured.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
CMA Merger team Looks for new Recruits
Leadership
08/02/2016CMA Merger team Looks for new Recruits

The CMA is on the lookout for talented individuals to join its merger team by recruiting for Principal Case Officer and Case Officer roles.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Most Innovative Law Firm of 2016, Scotland
Legal
04/04/2016Most Innovative Law Firm of 2016, Scotland

The Most Innovative Law Firm of 2016, Scotland is listed in the UK edition of March’s AI magazine.



Our Trusted Brands

Acquisition International is a flagship brand of AI Global Media. AI Global Media is a B2B enterprise and are committed to creating engaging content allowing businesses to market their services to a larger global audience. We have a number of unique brands, each of which serves a specific industry or region. Each brand covers the latest news in its sector and publishes a digital magazine and newsletter which is read by a global audience.

Arrow