© Copyright Acquisition International 2026 - All Rights Reserved.

Article Image - BREXIT Could be Expensive – Especially for the United Kingdom
Posted 27th April 2015

BREXIT Could be Expensive – Especially for the United Kingdom

Exiting the EU could cost the United Kingdom more than €300 billion.

Mouse Scroll AnimationScroll to keep reading

Let us help promote your business to a wider following.

BREXIT Could be Expensive – Especially for the United Kingdom
Image

BREXIT Could be Expensive – Especially for the United Kingdom

Exiting the EU could cost the United Kingdom more than €300 billion. The remaining EU member states would only experience minor economic losses from an exit. But elections in the British House of Commons could set a course for a bitter economic and above all political setback for the entire EU.

If the United Kingdom exits the EU in 2018 after the House of Commons elections on May 7, 2015 and a subsequent referendum on leaving the Union, this would have long-term negative consequences for the country’s growth dynamic and economic vitality. By contrast, the economic losses for Germany and the remaining EU member states would be significantly smaller. But the bottom line is that everyone involved would lose economically and politically from the UK leaving the EU (BREXIT). This is the conclusion reached by a current Bertelsmann Stiftung study in collaboration with the ifo Institute in Munich. It is the first study that examines the consequences of a UK exit from the EU (BREXIT) not only for the United Kingdom, but for all the other EU countries as well.

Calculating the economic effects of an EU exit is associated with many uncertainties and must take into account potential transitional periods. Three scenarios were developed to estimate the range of possible effects. In the most favorable case, the UK receives a status similar to Switzerland and still has a trade agreement with the EU. In the least favorable scenario, the country would lose all trade privileges arising from EU membership and its free trade agreements. In the year 2030 – 12 years after a possible BREXIT – we can assume that the negative effects will have shown their full impact.

Depending on the extent of the UK’s trade policy isolation, its real gross domestic product (GDP) per capita would be between 0.6% and 3% lower in the year 2030 than if the country remained in the EU. If the percentual losses are based on values from 2014, this would mean a real GDP per capita that is €220 lower in the most favorable scenario for the UK. With more severe isolation, the lost GDP could come in at €1025 per capita. If trade economic as well as dynamic economic consequences – such as the weakening of both innovative power as well as London as a financial center – are taken into account together, the GDP losses in the unfavorable scenario could reach 14 percent. If these losses are then based on values from the year 2014, this would correspond to a GDP that is around €313 billion lower for the entire national economy, or lower by around €4850 per capita. Possible savings such as the cancelling of EU budget payments that currently total around 0.5 percent of the British GDP could not compensate for economic losses, even in the best case scenario.

Above all, exiting the EU would increase the costs of trade between the UK and EU and reduce trade activities. The severity of the impact will differ for individual British industries. For the important area of financial services, anticipated losses in added value reach around 5 percent in the unfavorable scenario. The chemicals, mechanical engineering and automotive industries will see steep losses in added value because they are heavily incorporated in European value chains. The chemicals industry will face the greatest drop – nearly 11 percent.

By contrast, the economic deadweight welfare losses from a BREXIT would be significantly smaller for Germany and the remaining EU states. Depending on the extent of the UK’s trade policy isolation, Germany’s real gross domestic product (GDP) per capita when considering trade effects alone would only be between 0.1% and 0.3% lower in the year 2030 than if the country remained in the EU. Based on the GDP from 2014, this corresponds to a lower GDP per capita of €30-€115. Individual industries would be impacted differently by lower export levels to the UK. The automotive industry would see the greatest drop with a decline of up to 2%. In addition to the automotive industry, the electronics, metal production and food industries would all see negative cuts as well. Taking the dynamic consequences into account, Germany’s estimated GDP losses would come in between 0.3% and 2%. In terms of the national economy from 2014, this would be around €100 per capita (or €8.7 billion for the entire economy) for a low level of UK isolation and about €700 per capita (or almost €58 billion for the entire economy) for a loss of all UK trade privileges.

Categories: Finance


You Might Also Like
Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Advice You Can Count On
Leadership
13/02/2017Advice You Can Count On

(HIS) Cummings Global Associates Ltd, 2016 Boutique Business of the Year, is a firm of business consultants who specialise in working with small businesses and entrepreneurs.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Balancing the Books
Legal
04/01/2017Balancing the Books

Professional Accounting and Taxation Limited is a professional accounting firm established in Hong Kong since 1982. We have a great team of good experienced and specialised associates with expertise in accounting, taxation and legal knowledge. Our client base

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
CEO of the Year, Switzerland
Leadership
18/03/2016CEO of the Year, Switzerland

CEO of the Year, Switzerland.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
The Advantages of Fintech Innovations in Finance
Finance
20/05/2020The Advantages of Fintech Innovations in Finance

The financial sector has had to adjust quickly to the rapidly changing landscape that Fintech innovations have brought. None more so than the established, older organisations who are having to look at new ways to do business so as not to get left behind. In

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
US Equities Offer the Best Opportunities in 2015, Say Investors
Finance
25/02/2015US Equities Offer the Best Opportunities in 2015, Say Investors

Majority of affluent US investors surveyed by Legg Mason say they are maintaining their equity allocation over the next 12 months.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Redefining Business Advisory Services
News
26/07/2022Redefining Business Advisory Services

Recognising the clear, unmet need for a reliable one-stop shop for business, financial and professional services, Occams Advisory was founded in 2012 to provide complete solutions in the areas of Business Services and Growth Incubation (BSGI), Capital Markets

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
A Trademark  of Success
Leadership
29/09/2016A Trademark of Success

Based in New York, Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP is a full-service Intellectual Property law firm.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Balancing Privacy and Security: The Debate Over Biometric Background Checks
Legal
18/03/2025Balancing Privacy and Security: The Debate Over Biometric Background Checks

Background checks are a standard part of the hiring process at many companies. While these verification procedures are often essential, they can also introduce some complications around privacy and ethics. The use of biometric authentication in this sphere fur

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
New product Increases Engagement In Games
Finance
06/08/2015New product Increases Engagement In Games

Mobile Engagement Company First to Unite the Power of Predictive Analytics and Mobile Messaging to Target Key Player Groups, Generating Impressive Results Including 11% Decrease in Churn, 18% Increase in Number of Sessions and 50% Increase in Revenue.



Our Trusted Brands

Acquisition International is a flagship brand of AI Global Media. AI Global Media is a B2B enterprise and are committed to creating engaging content allowing businesses to market their services to a larger global audience. We have a number of unique brands, each of which serves a specific industry or region. Each brand covers the latest news in its sector and publishes a digital magazine and newsletter which is read by a global audience.

Arrow